| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. FACTION STANDING REPAIR PLAN - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson Originally by: Bernardo Guii My apologies for the small and possibly stupid questions. No need to be sorry, the only stupid questions are the ones that aren't asked. If you're not sure about some...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2010.11.18 06:28:00
|
2. FACTION STANDING REPAIR PLAN - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Hey DMC, great guide! Thanks a ton, buddy! I don't mean to be a word-smith, but there are a few small questions I hope you can clarify. You said: Quote: "After completing all the lv 1 Data Center Agent missions, now do the lv 1 Cosmos Age...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2010.11.17 03:31:00
|
3. A way to stop rouge corp/alliance leaders - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Bernardo Guii on 26/09/2007 01:04:02 Originally by: vinnymcg Originally by: Xanstin Corp leaders lead corps, no matter what colour they are. Don't like it, leave corp TBH Well thats a stupid comment! ... He ...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.09.26 01:03:00
|
4. Make sovereignty actually COUNT for something! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This is a great idea! /signed I like that it ties in factional warfare. I like that it finally gives smaller corps and alliances a chance to play in 0.0. Why should we all have to join BOB or another big and impersonal alliance just to have a c...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.09.20 23:39:00
|
5. REVELATIONS II deployment starting at 0200 GMT on 19 June - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ok. I am a little confused about this multiple account problem. I currently use multiple accounts and I often access the chatlogs and game logs. Will these change location from the folder where I install the game? Will they all be saved in one l...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.06.19 13:02:00
|
6. Simple POS Spam Solution - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong ... I wrote this precicely because of "we are in feature freeze for rev 2". This change ought to be easy enough to implement before Rev 2, given the rev 2 time frame, or in a small patch afterwards. If you want ...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.06.07 05:45:00
|
7. Server issues today, Thursday, May 24 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
NOTE: taken from the other thread they just locked... Originally by: Sentinel Eeex Originally by: Tod Klemp I think todays patch needs a rollback. No. We need more features. We need more useless objects in space. We need new ...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.05.25 08:17:00
|
8. Xaen's List of UI Improvements - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Some great ideas here. /signed /bump Sorry - no - I don't have anything else to add, but this was on page 3 - so - back to the top for you!
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.05.16 03:13:00
|
9. Good Guys v. Bad Guys - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Bernardo Guii on 13/05/2007 02:24:25 I really liked this idea Remove Security Status - Declare them Pirates! EDIT: sorry, I guess the OP renamed the thread. Same info though. The OP of this thread suggested simply eliminating...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.05.13 02:24:00
|
10. Solving Piracy - Abolish player sec-status Add declarations of piracy - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like these suggestions, so.... /bump
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.04.22 15:20:00
|
11. Solving Piracy - Abolish player sec-status Add declarations of piracy - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
/signed with some clarifications... First of all, I love this idea. It plays right into the factional warfare that CCP wants to introduce. It also has strong historical examples to draw upon. It adds a new dimension to the game and to piracy and...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.04.21 04:39:00
|
12. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Zalathar ...Nerfing nano ships would also be ANOTHER serious blow to the minmatar. If someone has invested the time, money and thought to make a nano ship, let him have it... Short answer: Ahh.... NO! I don't care if ...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.03.01 01:43:00
|
13. LAG: CCP's solution to moving level 4 missions to lowsec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Grez Edited by: Grez on 05/02/2007 13:42:34 Originally by: 10of12 But people log in to do a mission and not to scan some pirate. Because pirates like to kill other people doesn't mean everybody likes it. Eve is ...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.02.05 14:03:00
|
14. LAG: CCP's solution to moving level 4 missions to lowsec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Logi3 Do you want every thing in Eve to be safe? Would you like bubble wrap around your ship? The option is in game for the missions runners to gang up and hunt out the pirates. Sigh. Have you read this thread? The WHOLE ...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.02.05 13:59:00
|
15. LAG: CCP's solution to moving level 4 missions to lowsec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: FireFoxx80 I cant see why people are panicking and threatening to leave Eve over possibility that lvl4 agents might move to low-sec (note, not 0.0 ). As Oveur said, Risk vs Reward. People worrying about pilots is unfound...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.02.05 11:43:00
|
16. LAG: CCP's solution to moving level 4 missions to lowsec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tommy TenKreds Edited by: Tommy TenKreds on 05/02/2007 07:26:19 Originally by: nutbar So, think of high-sec as a PVE server, and low-sec as a PVP server. If I want to PVP, I'll go where I have to in order to do...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.02.05 08:03:00
|
17. LAG: CCP's solution to moving level 4 missions to lowsec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EDIT to my last post: I am not against the idea of moving some agents to lowsec, or 0.0. Heck, I even LIKE the idea that the highest quality agents would be in lowsec - it just kinda makes sense, doesn't it? With greater reward come MUCH greater ...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.02.05 06:57:00
|
18. LAG: CCP's solution to moving level 4 missions to lowsec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Thor Xian Dump agents and missions altogether imo. They don't bring anything to the game except Bhaalgorns...and that is a sacrifice I'm willing to make. Oh, so nice of you to tell us all how to play the game we ALSO pay ...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.02.05 06:21:00
|
19. LAG: CCP's solution to moving level 4 missions to lowsec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The lag in systems like Motsu, Saila and Laah is unplayable. (Yes, I know all about moving to different agents in less populated systems. We dont need to discuss this here - the fact is that many people dont want to lose the 200K of LPs that they...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.02.04 15:55:00
|
20. ECCM for NOS, Painting, Dampening and Webbing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Bernardo Guii on 29/01/2007 11:54:03 Originally by: Valandril Edited by: Valandril on 29/01/2007 10:16:13 Guys u made me cry from laughting, thanks everyone u just earned 1 isk. (check your wallets) OP says that he wann...
- by Bernardo Guii - at 2007.01.29 11:56:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |